Send charcoal for carbon dating Free sex cam private chat
In other words, real radiocarbon is an integral part of the “ancient” organic materials.
But these scientists’ presuppositions prevent them from reaching this conclusion. Andrew Snelling Figure 3 Sample from Marlstone Rock Bed, a muddy limestone in one wall of the Hornton Quarries at Edge Hill, west of Banbury in England.
So rock samples that should read zero are occasionally placed into the instruments to test their accuracy.
What better samples to use than fossils, coals, and limestones, which are supposed to be millions of years old and should have no radiocarbon?
Figure 2 Radiocarbon shouldn’t be found in “old” rocks, but it is!
Once creatures die, the radiocarbon in their bodies should quickly break down.
But samples of organic materials taken from every rock layer, such as fossils, coal, limestone, natural gas, and graphite, all have measurable radiocarbon.However, when the technician meticulously cleans the rocks with hot strong acids and other pre-treatments to remove any possible contamination, these “ancient” organic (once-living) materials still contain measurable radiocarbon.Since a blank sample holder in the AMS instrument predictably yields zero radiocarbon, these scientists should naturally conclude that the radiocarbon is “intrinsic” to the rocks.(This percentage, technically known as percent modern carbon [p MC], shows the ratio of radiocarbon in the rocks and fossils compared to the amount we find in living things).This finding is consistent with the belief that rocks are only thousands of years old, but the specialists who obtained these results have definitely not accepted this conclusion. To keep from concluding that the rocks are only thousands of years old, they claim that the radiocarbon must be due to contamination, either from the field or from the laboratory or from both.